top of page
RECENT POSTS

The Cod Wars: When Iceland Defeated the British

  • Writer: Jacob Hurley
    Jacob Hurley
  • Nov 13, 2022
  • 5 min read

In the middle of the 20 th century, Iceland, a small and sparsely populated island nation, bested the United Kingdom, formerly the biggest empire in the world, and still a significant world power. Iceland beat the British not once, but an unprecedented three times, achieving significant victories in each of the three “Cod Wars.” Faced with this situation, there is one clear question: How did Iceland do it?

Iceland was by no means a wealthy or even highly developed nation. Their population was low, and their natural resources were sparse. In the 1950s, Iceland had two valuable assets: a strategic position in the North Atlantic, and a lucrative fishing industry. Looking out for the latter, Iceland extended their fishery zones from three to four miles away from the coast in 1952, limiting the ability of foreign fishermen to work in Icelandic waters.[1] This seemingly small action would lay the groundwork for three Cod Wars fought intermittently over 18 years.

When the United Kingdom received word of Iceland’s move, they were furious. The British relied heavily on fishing the waters around Iceland, and responded to the small country’s perceived attempt to push them around by banning Icelandic fish from British markets.[2] This was a significant blow, as fishing accounted for 90% of Iceland’s exports, and the UK was their biggest trading partner. Luckily for Iceland, the British strategy failed resoundingly when the USSR went out of its way to buy Icelandic fish, leading the US to immediately follow suit and encourage its allies to do so as well due to fear that Iceland would enter the Soviet sphere of influence. Britain eventually followed suit, recognizing the new four-mile Icelandic fishing zone and re-opening its markets in 1956.[3]

That relatively small dispute between Iceland and the British would serve as a model for the three ensuing Cod Wars. While the British were substantially more powerful than Iceland, the US Keflavik military base in Iceland made the country a significant player in Cold War politics, and the country used that advantage to bring NATO to its knees in 1961.


Emboldened by their previous victory, Iceland

expanded their exclusive fishing zone from four to twelve nautical miles out in 1958, sparking the

first full-on Cod War.[4] This action was unanimously

condemned by NATO and greatly outraged the UK, who sent the Royal Navy into disputed waters to protect British fishing vessels from attacks by the Icelandic Coast Guard. Tensions were higher than ever. To Iceland, they were looking out for their own livelihood. To the UK, Iceland was resorting to blackmail to get what they wanted.[5] Skirmishes grew intense. Shots were fired, and a few tense standoffs threatened to escalate dangerously. With the Royal Navy pushing back hard against the smaller and less equipped Icelandic Coast Guard, Iceland used their last and strongest card to turn the tides of the conflict. The government threatened to pull out of NATO and shut down the American-run Keflavik military base, which greatly alarmed the

United States, who had attempted to stay neutral throughout the conflict. The US believed Iceland’s threats, and was terrified by the idea of an Iceland, free from US influence, turning to the USSR for support and recognition. With this possibility in mind, the US pushed NATO and the UK to recognize the 12-mile fishing zone, ending the First Cod War in 1961.[6]

The final two Cod Wars followed a similar pattern. In 1972, Iceland again extended their exclusive fishing zone, this time more than tripling the 12-mile limit with a new 50-mile limit. Britain and NATO were incensed, fishing lines were cut, boats were rammed, Iceland threatened to leave NATO and expel US troops, and won once again, with NATO pressuring Britain into accepting the new fishing zone in 1973, with minimal concessions on the part of Iceland.[7]

The third and final Cod War took place from 1975 to 1976, and saw the most brazen extension of fishing rights yet, to 200 nautical miles from the Icelandic coast. Shots were again fired, and there were 35 separate ramming incidents in the disputed waters within six months.[8] This controversy proved to be the tensest of them all, with Iceland actually severing diplomatic ties with the UK. For a third and final time, NATO stepped in and resolved the conflict, with

Iceland winning its 200-mile fishing zone, and setting the precedent that would later be adopted worldwide, when the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea established the standard of a 200-nautical mile exclusive economic zone (EEZ), which has since been adopted around the world.[9]


Overall, the Cod Wars might seem like a bizarre historical anecdote. In the “wars,” while tensions were

often high, there was only one death (an accident, at that) and few injuries. To some, the Cod Wars might seem rather trivial. To Iceland, however, this was far from the case. Their economy was heavily dependent on fishing, and any interruption to their ability to fish, in their eyes, jeopardized the very existence of the country. To Icelanders, cod fishing funded the development of their country, and pushed them into the modern world. Any threat to that, even from a close ally like Britain, was to be met with fierce determination and hostility.[10] Thanks to that

determination, Iceland was able to protect their fishing industry, and leave a notable mark on the world through the 200-mile EEZ. Though Iceland resorted to somewhat dubious tactics during the Cod Wars, they nevertheless managed to oppose the powerhouses of the western world and win. An impressive feat for a small island nation, regardless of the circumstances.


Notes

[1] Frost, Natasha. “How Iceland Beat the British in the Four Cod Wars.” Atlas Obscura, June

21, 2018. http://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/what-were-cod-wars.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Jóhannesson, Gudni Th. “To the Edge of Nowhere?” Naval War College Review 57, no. ¾

(Summer/Autumn2004 2004): 118.

https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=31h&AN=15287994&site=ehost-live.

[4] Ingimundarson, Valur. “A Western Cold War: The Crisis in Iceland’s Relations with Britain,

the United States, and NATO, 1971-74.” Diplomacy & Statecraft 14, no. 4 (December 2003):

94–136. doi:10.1080/09592290312331295694.

[5] Jóhannesson, Gudni Th. “To the Edge of Nowhere?” Naval War College Review 57, no. ¾

(Summer/Autumn2004 2004): 121.

https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=31h&AN=15287994&site=ehost-live.

[6] Frost, Natasha. “How Iceland Beat the British in the Four Cod Wars.” Atlas Obscura, June

21, 2018. http://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/what-were-cod-wars.

[7] “The Cod Wars.” The Cabinet Papers. The National Archives, December 1, 2008.


Bibliography


Articles:

“The Cod Wars.” The Cabinet Papers. The National Archives, December 1, 2008. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cabinetpapers/themes/cod-wars.htm.

Frost, Natasha. “How Iceland Beat the British in the Four Cod Wars.” Atlas Obscura, June 21, 2018. http://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/what-were-cod-wars.

Ingimundarson, Valur. “A Western Cold War: The Crisis in Iceland’s Relations with Britain, the United States, and NATO, 1971-74.” Diplomacy & Statecraft 14, no. 4 (December 2003): 94–136. doi:10.1080/09592290312331295694.

Jóhannesson, Gudni Th. “To the Edge of Nowhere?” Naval War College Review 57, no. 3/4 (Summer/Autumn2004 2004): 115–37. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspxdirect=true&db=31h&AN=15287994&site=ehos

t-live.

“What Is the ‘EEZ’?” What is the "EEZ"?: Exploration Facts: NOAA Office of Ocean Exploration and Research. Accessed November 9, 2022. https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/facts/useez.html.

Pictures:

“The Cod Wars.” St Andrews Dock Heritage Park Action Group. Accessed November 9, 2022. https://www.hullfishingheritage.org.uk/the-cod-wars/.

“Cod Wars: British Sea Fishing.” British Sea Fishing. Accessed November 9, 2022. https://britishseafishing.co.uk/the-cod-wars/.

Chambers, Jewells. “The Cod Wars: Iceland vs Britain - EP.36.” All Things Iceland, December 28, 2019. https://allthingsiceland.com/the-cod-wars-iceland-vs-britain-ep-36/.

Jarrett, Matthew. “The Cod Wars.” Forgotten History. Forgotten History, February 21, 2020. https://www.forgottenhistory.me/war/the-cod-wars.


 
 
 

9 Comments


Robert Gandell
Robert Gandell
2 days ago

This Cod Wars piece really shows how a small nation can win by playing to its strengths, not its size, which feels surprisingly relevant to modern business case studies. Iceland leveraged geopolitics, alliances and economic pressure instead of brute force, much like how firms today use smart operations strategy to outmaneuver larger rivals. It instantly reminded me of a Tesco Operations Management Case Study I read from New Assignment Help UK, where Tesco stayed competitive by optimising supply chains and capacity management rather than just opening more stores. Both Iceland and Tesco prove that understanding your environment, using leverage wisely and making deliberate operational choices can turn an apparent disadvantage into a long‑term win.

Like

Bobby Dixon
Bobby Dixon
Mar 13

What a brilliant piece — the Cod Wars are honestly one of those underrated chapters of history that deserves way more attention than it gets! It's genuinely fascinating how Iceland, a tiny nation with limited resources, managed to outmanoeuvre a global power like Britain not once but three times, essentially by playing Cold War politics like a chess grandmaster. The detail about the USSR swooping in to buy Icelandic fish and flipping the whole situation is almost cinematic. As a history student, reading well-researched articles like this really highlights how much context matters when analysing geopolitical conflicts — something I've also noticed when browsing free assignment samples for University students on New Assignment Help UK, which often show how framing…

Like

Nancy Wheeler
Nancy Wheeler
Mar 09

I read the post about the Cod Wars, and it was interesting to see how Iceland stood its ground against Britain over fishing rights, turning what seemed like small disputes into real national pride and change. The way they explained the history and tactics made the conflict feel clearer and more exciting. I remember one stressful semester when I needed BTEC Assignment Service UK late one night to organize my notes and finish on time. It reminded me that good support and a clear plan make tough challenges easier to handle.

Like

Rose June
Rose June
Mar 02

Among experienced managers seeking formal recognition, the cmi level 7 strategic management and leadership award offers structured professional validation. The College of Contract Management aligns its teaching with recognised management standards. Strategic evaluation is consistently linked to leadership behaviour. That connection encourages responsible and informed practice.

Like

Cole Owen
Cole Owen
Feb 24

This was such an eye-opening read! I'd heard the term "Cod Wars" before but never really understood the full story behind it. The way Iceland used its NATO leverage so strategically is genuinely impressive — it shows that economic survival can drive even the smallest nations to stand up to major powers. As someone who studied modern British history, this period doesn't get nearly enough attention in classrooms. The impact on UK fishing communities alone deserves more coverage. For students diving into topics like this, finding good assignment help for UK students can really make a difference when trying to analyse complex diplomatic conflicts and present them coherently in essays. Thanks for writing this — definitely sharing it with a…

Like
SEARCH BY TAGS
ARCHIVE
bottom of page